Previous Page  10 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

10

SUBPRO Subsea Production and Processing

New control and safety philosophy

Conduct

case

studies

Identify

future

risks

Eliminate

topside

based req.

a significant interest from industry partners on

this topic. One issue already identified during the

interaction is the opportunity to learn from recent

subsea processing installations, like Åsgard sub-

sea compression. During the first half year of the

project, industry partners have contributed with

specific input in dedicated workshops and reports,

both on understanding challenges but also on

framing conditions for future field developments.

This insight will be used to propose, with support

from industry, some preliminary (and conceptual)

alternative architectures. These alternatives will

be discussed, iterated, and evaluated against

regulatory requirements and subsea risk condi-

tions. An outcome of the project is new knowledge

and new principles that may be further adapted

into new or existing standards on subsea design

and operation.

Project manager, Prof.

Mary Ann Lundteigen

Postdoc, HyungJu Kim

Co-supervisor,

Associate Prof. Christian

Holden,

New safety and control philosophy

The main objective in this project is to develop

a new control and safety philosophy for subsea

systems. The new philosophy aims to overcome

some of the challenges of implementing such

systems with basis in standards developed for

topside conditions, and to ensure that the subsea

safety risks and subsea operating environment are

fully captured. It is a need to reduce complexity of

systems and their interaction, while maintaining a

high integrity of critical functions.

The first year of the project focuses on detailing

the challenges of existing subsea control and

safety systems, identifying subsea risks associat-

ed with different subsea field architectures and lo-

cations, and investigating industry practise on the

application of risk acceptance criteria for safety

and asset protection functions. We have seen

Figure 7. Key steps towards new philosophy

Figure 8. Main tasks of subproject

Study risksand

acceptancecriteria in

subsea systems

Study controland

safetyphilosophyof

current subsea system

Identify challengesof

currentphilosophy

Studyphilosophiesof

other industriesand

new theories/models

Developanew control

and safetyphilosophy

Conduct case studies

Propose thenew

philosophy for

adaptionby standards

MainTasks

Many of the future developments in subsea require adaption of new technology and new ways of operation.

Safe operation is paramount, but more focus is placed on achieving high safety and availability level with

more cost efficient solutions. Topside design principles and philosophies are often modified for subsea use

(to ensure well proven design), but future field development will require tailor-made solutions for subsea

conditions. Reliability, availability, maintenance and safety (RAMS) are four important properties of systems

that need to be specified and included in the evaluation of design alternatives. For the RAMS research area,

the overall aim is to develop new knowledge, methods and tools to support decision-making about RAMS in

design as well as in operation. In the first three years of SUBPRO, the focus is on developing:

• A new philosophy for subsea safety and control systems

• A new framework and models to support the specification and evaluation of subsea solutions in an early design phase

• New models and methods for prognostics-based maintenance planning of subsea systems

RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY, MAINTENANCE

AND SAFETY (RAMS)

Research area manager,

Prof. Mary Ann Lundteigen