9
Annual Report 2015
Multiphase booster models
Project manager and main
PhD supervisor, Prof.
Sigbjørn Sangesland
Subsea multiphase boosting offers several advan-
tages in field development for both greenfield and
brownfield projects. Furthermore, it seems to be
a key enabler for development of remote fields.
Currently several subsea boosting technologies
are commercially available and have been suc-
cessfully installed and tested in fields around the
world. However, for the early phases in the as-
sessment of a subsea field, models are required
for an appropriate selection of available technol-
ogies, including preliminary calculations of flow
and discharge pressure capabilities and power
requirements. At this stage, uncertainty level is
very high and therefore accurate models are not
required. Simplified models coupled with process
simulators and other commercial tools will be
sufficient. Simplified models will also enable an
integrated modelling of the field and production
optimisation in the conceptual design phase. Nev-
ertheless, detailed performance prediction mod-
els of multiphase boosters is also required under
changing conditions in the field lifetime (e.g. flow
rates, fluid properties, gas void fraction)
(Figure 6)
.
This calls for an increased understanding of ther-
modynamics and fluid dynamics phenomena in
multiphase boosters. Therefore, the main goal in
this project is the development of numerical mod-
els for prediction of multiphase booster perfor-
mance. In the first phase of the project, the main
goal is the development of a simplified and robust
model for currently available technologies for sub-
sea multiphase boosting. Subsequently, the focus
will be a detailed study of thermodynamic and flu-
id dynamics phenomena in multiphase boosters.
Finally, the comprehensive study of multiphase
behaviour of pumps and compressors will aid the
development of more accurate proxy-models for
performance prediction. After discussion with the
industrial partners, it has been decided to focus on
one specific type of booster (Semi-axial impeller).
PhD Candidate,
Gilberto Nunez
Co-Supervisor, Postdoc
Jesus De Andrade
Co-Supervisor, Prof.
emeritus Michael Golan
Subsea gate box
Different we ls i a subsea
oi
field have differ nt production capacities, diffe
production constraints and different production targets dictated by rese
management. Therefore, they are subject to individual management and con
However, th luster nature of the field,
commingling the production streams of the
individual
wells,
creates
a
strong
inter ependence of the flow rates and
production pressures of the individual wells.
Thus, as the wells are producing in a network, a
change in operating conditions of one well,
affects all other wells in the cluster and
consequently the total network outcome. The
results of this interdependency is that the
production rate of the integrated system is,
most often, considerably sub-optimal.
This project explores new facilities and system
configurations, as well as novel strategies to
achieve efficient and optimal management of the integrated system. This include
optimization over the entire life of the field, accounting for the considerable cha
in production conditions associated with the reservoir recovery process.
In short, the challenge in the project is to optimise the recovery and revenue fro
asset by managing the interdependencies between the wells.
The project will identify and evaluate the feasibility and the implication of variou
subsea systems architecture alternatives. A central element of the project is the
development of a modular and multi-functional assembly to allow easy re-routin
well streams and a quick and easy deployment of separation and compression
capabilities to a single well, to a group of wells or to the entire cluster. The assem
named Subsea gate box will be configured to account for all the default demands
modern subsea process equipment, including; compactness, robustness, ease of
deployment and integration in the entire system and ease of operation.
The Subsea gate box is configurable as a template that can accommodate individ
well modules and compartments, containing process equipment (
Figure 3
). The
process equipment may include separators, pumps, compressors, control valves
or flow meters, according to the characteristics of the well stream. A task in the e
phase of the project (
Figure 4
) will be to identify the leading technology in the
market that suits best to a compact and modular solution. The project deliverabl
will include a description of the state-of-the-art subsea process technology,
Figure 3. Subsea Gate Box concept sk
Co-supervisor,
Professor Emeritus
Michael Golan
Co-supervisor,
Assoc. Professor
Milan Stanko
Postdoc,
Mariana Diaz
Project manager
and main
supervisor,
Prof. Sigbjørn
Sangesland
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Dimensionless differential pressure,
∆
P/
∆
P
ref
[-]
Dimensionless flow, Q/Q
ref
[-]
Single Phase
10% GVF
20% GVF
30% GVF
40% GVF
Figure.
Example of changing multiphase pump performance due to different gas void fraction (GVF)
Figure 6. Example of changing multiphase pump performance due to different gas void fraction (GVF)