Background Image
Previous Page  64 / 130 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 64 / 130 Next Page
Page Background

antiquity, and formulas for third- and fourth-degree equations had been found during the

Renaissance. However, the solution of the fifth degree equation, the quintic, had eluded

mathematidans for 250 years. Abel thought he had found the solution, but soon discovered

his own mistake. Then, with a stroke of genf.us, he radically changed his point of view and

proved that no such solution could exist! Assuming the formula's existence, he derived the

consequences !hat this would have for the original equation. and through an ingenious

insight, he came to the conclusion that not all quintic equations had the necessary form. He

reported this result in a very brief paper and published it privately in Christiana, where, not

surprisingly, it remained unnoticed. However, he wrote a more complete version of the proof

in Cre//e's

Journal.

He then started to work on elliptic functions and elliptic integrals. This was

technically more demanding, and even now., two centuries later, it is still even difficult to

explain to professionals. The crowning glory of his Paris treatise was the addition theorem for

elliptic integrals. Once it had been digested by his peers, recognition came fast. The German

mathematician Alfred Clebsch (1833-72) claimed that algebraic geometry, one of the basic

mathematical disciplines, starts with Abel's addition theorem. For a more detailed

presentation of Abel's mathematics, see Houzel, 2004.

The French mathematician Adrien-Marie Legendre (1752-1833), stated that the Paris

treatise was "Monumentum aere perennius

1

".

The German Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi (1804-

51 ), one of Abel's fiercest competitors, said "...die grosste mathematische Entdeckung

unserer Zeit, obgleich erst eien kOnftige, vielleicht spate grosse Arbeit ihre ganze Bedeutung

aufweisen k<>nne". The French mathematician Charles Emile Picard (1856-1941), who

belongs to the generation following Abel, stated "...il n'y peut-etre pas dans l'historire de la

Science, de proposition aussi importante obtenie

a

l'aide de considerations aussi simples".

The leading Norwegian mathematician of the 20

111

century, Atle Selberg, had !his to say about

Abel's addition theorem, "Det står for meg som den rene magi. Hverken hos Gauss eller

Riemann eller noen annen har jeg funnet noe som kan riktig måle seg med dette

2

" .

Sir

Michael Atiyah, the Abel Laureate in 2004, said in his acceptance speech "Abel was really

the first modern mathematician. His whole approach, with its generality, its insight and

its

elegance sel the tone for the next two centuries. His early death was a terrible loss - imagine

if Mozart had died at a similar age. It has been said that, had Abel lived longer, he would

have been the natura! successor to the great Gauss ... except for the fact that Abel was a

much nicer man, modest, friendly and likeable".

The Abel Prize

In August 2001, the Norwegian Prime Minister, Jens Stoltenberg, announced at a meeting at

the University of Oslo that his government would establish a fund with a dual purpose,

namely (1) to award an annua! international Abel Prize in mathematics and (2) to stimulate

an interest in mathematics among the yOI!Jth. The history leading up to this event is

interesting, (see Helsvig, 2013

&

2014}, and really starts with the aborted attempts to create

an Abel Prize at the centennial of his birth in 1902. A serendipitous meeting in a bookstore in

Risør between Abel biographer, Arild Stubhaug, and the CEO of Televerket, Tormod

Hermansen, restarted the process that eventually led to the creation of the annua! Abel

Prize.

The Abel Laureates

The first prize, awarded in 2003, went to the French mathematician Jean-Pierre Serre. The

subsequent laureates are Sir Michael Atiyah (UK) and lsadore Singer (USA) in 2004, Peter.

D. Lax (USA) in 2005, Lennart Carlseon (Sweden) in 2006, Srinivasa Varadhan (lndia/USA)

1

A monument more lasting than bronze.

2

It seems like pure magic to me. l have found nothing in the works of Gauss, Riemann or

anyone else that can compare with it.

62