Previous Page  16 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

16

SUBPRO Subsea Production and Processing

used for hydrate control in the

well flowlines, giving in total 3

different chemical systems with

separate absorption and regen-

eration equipment. Simplifying

the chemical systems or mov-

ing equipment and process ele-

ments subsea could be a way to

ensure better energy efficiency

and utilization of the resources.

The objective of this project is to develop a

regenerative process where hydrate formation is

controlled and H

2

S is removed. Since this would

be a regenerative process, significantly higher

concentrations of H

2

S could be treated than what

normally is the case with e.g. triazine. The work will

contain both modelling and experimental studies.

Pipelines used to transport produced gas have

quality restrictions related to content of water, CO

2

,

H

2

S and heavy hydrocarbons. If these requirements

cannot be met by the well flow, separation is re-

quired either topside or subsea. Today on a typical

platform, water is removed by Triethylene glycol

while CO

2

and H

2

S is removed by amine processes.

In addition to this, Mono-ethylene glycol (MEG) is

H

2

S and hydrate control, particle breakup/contactor studies

Project manager and PhD

supervisor, Associate

Prof. Hanna Knuutila

PhD candidate, Eirini

Skylogianni

Postdoc, Jing Shi

One of the main process-

ing steps in natural gas

processing is dehydration.

This has been identified by

our industry partners as a

major challenge, in order

to prevent hydrate for-

mation, slug flow, corro-

sion and erosion in pipes

and process equipment.

Membranes for gas dehydration

Project manager and main

PhD supervisor, Associate

Prof. Liyuan Deng

PhD candidate,

Kristin Dalane

Co-supervisor, Prof.

Magne Hillestad

The objective for this project is to evaluate a new

membrane process design for subsea natural gas

dehydration

(Figure 13)

to reach pipeline transport

specifications. To evaluate the membrane dehy-

dration process, modelling and process simula-

tion will be conducted. The two membrane mod-

ules will be modelled and verified before they are

implemented into the simulation tool HYSYS for

an overall process design evaluation and optimi-

zation. With a verified and optimized process sim-

ulation model a feasibility study of the membrane

dehydration process can be reported. In a later

stage, there will be a need for verification of mod-

els through experimental testing.

With subsea dehydration, no water will be present

in downstream gas pipelines and process equip-

ment, which gives several advantages: Prob-

lems connected to

multiphase transport will be

removed and there is no need for other mitigation

techniques as continuous injection of preven-

tion chemicals like Mono-ethylene glycol (MEG).

In addition, dehydration in an earlier processing

stage will reduce the cost and complexity of the

downstream equipment.

Figure 13. Preliminary process design for closed

loop membrane dehydration with glycol. Water from

wet natural gas is absorbed by glycol in a membrane

contactor, and glycol is regenerated with pervapora-

tion where the water is removed from the rich glycol.

Co-supervisor, Prof. Emeritus

Hallvard Fjøsne Svendsen